Evolution is supported by transitional fossils. Transitional fossils are the remains of intermediary forms of life that illustrate an evolutionary transition. Such fossils would serve as evidence to the principle that life is developed through evolving organisms, which again, points to one ancestral source.
Some examples are the Nautoloidea, this is a group of marine cephalopods belong to the subclass Nautioidea. This is one of the many examples of one transitional forms discovered through fossils linking one species to another.
Examples of these links are fish to tetra pods, amphibians to amniotes, and dinosaurs to birds. Transitional forms are a major support of evolution Fossils through fossil dating, hominoid fossils, and living fossils shed much light to evolution and its validity. Although it only covers a small section of the multi-faceted theory, it is a crucial one.
Fossils can be used as a testament to the gradual changes in nature and in mankind. It also shows that the world is extremel. Are you sure you want to delete this answer? This is a really good essay. I am doubly impressed that you were able to research this with very little help from your school and teacher who apparently treat evolution like like an unpleasant but unavoidable pair of smelly socks they have to deal with.
So this idea that they teach kids nothing about it other than to send them out to get "education by Internet" and return with reasons why one of the core principles of science are wrong, is just a HORRIBLE approach to education.
But you have seen past that and seem to have found some good sources. Darwin's theory explains WHY evolution change occurs. His theory is called 'natural selection', which you don't cover and that's fine. By the way, here's a source you can cite for that definition: This is only one small part of the evidence for evolution. The DNA evidence alone is enough to establish common ancestry between species, even if not a single fossil had ever been found! However, I notice from your other post, that you seem to be required to limit your essay to just fossils.
I would reword this as " I really like how you laid out the structure of your essay, and then re-established that structure in the first and last sentence of each paragraph. Your school may not teach science well, but they are teaching the basics of good essay writing. You prove things in math, not science. The word "shows" would work just as well here.
Oh, and its "than creationists", not "then creationist". Scientists would call it a 'primitive bird', or better, 'bird-like dinosaur'. Second, you have not established what the Origin of Species is, or when it was published, or why this is relevant So you have to say something like: So this fossil provided powerful evidence for Darwin's framework. You jump back a couple of times between the words 'hominoid' and 'hominid'.
Hominoids are the apes, hominids are the great apes, so either one would do. The roots of humanity are located in Eastern Africa, not South Africa which is a country. For example, Ethiopia is in Eastern Africa. Ditto with last sentence of next paragraph. That's not quite true.
But if you read the full quote, you can see he wasn't. He had an answer. Includes an online extra: The Virtual Heart, with movie clips and other links. Miller wears a number of other hats. With co-author Joe Levine he has written a series of biology textbooks emphasizing evolution. His book Finding Darwin's God is an excellent response to the creationism and intelligent design movements.
His essays, participation in creationism debates, and appearances in PBS and other documentaries on evolution give him a high public profile. The most exciting thing to an experimental biologist, make no mistake about it, is an unsolved problem, a puzzling result, an unexplained observation. The most beautiful thing in science? It is just as Einstein said, a genuine mystery. Barbara McClintock and the Jumping Genes: Science, we are sometimes told, is all about facts.
Science is a method of finding out facts, and studying science is an exercise in learning those facts. Good science students, presumably, know lots of facts, and can recite them upon demand. Nearly every cell of the human body contains scores of mitochondria, tiny organelles that play a key role in releasing cellular energy.
Every student of biology learns some more willingly than others that mitochondria are home to a complex series of biochemical pathways, including the Krebs cycle and the electron transport chain. The Protein that Wasn't There: The Discovery of Ribozymes: If we were challenged to describe, in layman's terms, what makes living matter different from non-living matter, I suspect that many of us would focus on nucleic acids. Their ability to encode information, to replicate, and their passage from one generation to the next is part and parcel of what makes life special.
Ironically, if one examines an organism carefully and observes what makes it alive, nucleic acids turn out to have very little direct effect on living matter. Click on books covers for reviews and purchasing details at Amazon. The Collapse of Irreducible Complexity. The great irony of the flagellum's increasing acceptance as an icon of anti-evolution is that fact that research had demolished its status as an example of irreducible complexity almost at the very moment it was first proclaimed.
A response to Michael Behe. The following essays appear to have been stimulated by the book, Icons of Evolution , by John Corrigan Jonathan Wells, a fundamentalist opponent of the teaching of evolution. Although not labelled as such, I think this is Miller's response to Jonathan Wells. Charges of Fraud are Misleading: Jonathan Wells, who wrote the article cited as a source of information.
While he has done no work on industrial melanism, he has written opinion about the work. To one outside the field, he passes as a scholar with Ph. Wells is intellectually dishonest. These answers were prepared by the National Center for Science Education. Mayr in the teaching chair at Harvard. Through his many books and monthly essays in Natural History magazine he became the foremost popularizer of evolution in the United States.
His incisive wit and pugnacious character, not to mention his polymath brilliance, cast him in the roll of the teacher you had to love or hate. His last book, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory was far too long. His life was far too short. Darwin's More Stately Mansion: A famous Victorian story reports the reaction of an aristocratic lady to the primary heresy of her time: Darwin says is not true; but, if it is true, let us hope that it will not become generally known.
Science and religion are not in conflict, for their teachings occupy distinctly different domains. Carl Sagan organized and attended the Vatican meeting that introduces this essay; he also shared my concern for fruitful cooperation between the different but vital realms of science and religion.
On Facts and Theories in Science: In science "fact" means "confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional consent. The Median Isn't the Message: Using statistics in the preservation of life. This essay by Gould was written after his first bout with cancer twenty years ago. Primordial Beasts, Creationists and the Mighty Yankees: There are two things that European intellectuals don't understand about Americans, I find.
One was Bill and Monica, or, our obsession with it. The second is how you can possibly have an anti-evolution movement in a modern scientific country. Bright Star Among Billions: With the death of Carl Sagan we have lost both a fine scientist and the greatest popularizer of the 20th century, if not of all time. The inheritance of acquired characters usually goes by the shorter, although historically inaccurate, name of Lamarckism.
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck , the great French biologist and early evolutionist, believed in the inheritance of acquired characters, but it was not the centerpiece of his evolutionary theory and was certainly not original with him. The Stephen Jay Gould Archive: This library contains more than 50 essays by Gould and about an equal number by a variety of authors writing either about Gould or commenting on the subjects he wrote about. See my separate page on Gouldiana for more essays, a list of his books, and some rejoinder to criticism from colleagues.
Dawkins has been to the UK what Dr. Gould has been to the USA, its finest teacher of evolution. Equally witty and pugnacious, I consider Dr. Dawkins' essay The Forty-fold Path to Enlightenment in his book Climbing Mount Improbable one of the finest pieces of writing in natural history.
An Open Letter to Prince Charles: Your Reith lecture saddened me. I have deep sympathy for your aims, and admiration for your sincerity.
But your hostility to science will not serve those aims; and your embracing of an ill-assorted jumble of mutually contradictory alternatives will lose you the respect that I think you deserve. Papers and Commentary by Dawkins: This page contains many of Richard Dawkins' articles for news-papers, magazines, and so forth. For his more academic work, you may find the bibliography page more useful. Click on a book cover to see reviews and purchasing details at Amazon.
Could multiple species of early hominids have existed side by side? Ignorance Is No Crime: It is absolutely safe to say that if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that. Ruse is a polymathic philosopher and historian of science, particularly with respect to the history of evolutionary thought. Based largely on his testimony, "Creation Science" was defeated in Arkansas in as being devoid of science.
His book Can a Darwinian be a Christian should be required reading for all fundamentalists. A Marriage Made in Heaven?
Somewhat immodestly let me elevate myself up to the status of Wilson, Dawkins, Dennett, and Lewontin, and consider a Darwinism-based argument which I have myself put forward against Christian belief. Speaking Out for Paleontology: Out at supper that night, someone struck up a hymn. No voice was louder than that of Stephen Jay Gould: The new Creationists have recently started to break from their strategy of unrelenting attack.
Thanks to biochemist Michael J. The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution , they have started to lift the veil from their own beliefs about origins qua science. Are intellectuals allowing dogma in science but not in religion? Is Darwin in the Details? Allen Orr's critique of Darwin's Black Box is devastating and, assuming that there are some out there who find the book plausible and yet have open minds, might do some good.
For me, although I did not need convincing, there is the sheer pleasure in seeing an expert in his field take on the ignorant and arrogantly presumptuous. However, I do feel that Orr failed to raise the most important issue of all: Did Behe have the right, in the first place, to appeal to design? Forsdyke is unusual among modern essayists in science. While he has published a great deal in technical journals of science and has two recent books to his credit, his work as an essayist is presented almost exclusively on his own academic website in well written and highly illustrated pages.
It is to be hoped that this body of work will survive his tenure in academia. Selected Papers and Commentary: At the bottom of this page you will find a number of links to historical essays by Darwin, Hooker and others that Dr.
Forsdyke has presented beautifully on his website. The birth of a new theory: Along with many other species of trilobites, mollusks, brachiopods, corals, and other invertebrates, the abundant Phacops rana inhabited the shallow-water inland seas that ran from the present-day Appalachian mountains as far west as Iowa.
North America lay astride the Equator in those days, and its shallow tropical seas literally teemed with life that has left a rich and dense fossil record. The fauna persisted for some 6 million to 8 million years. Evolution is a part of Seminars on Science, a program of online graduate-level professional development courses for K educators.
Niles Eldredge Species vs. Time In this example, a snail species, A, is isolated by a geographic barrier to form subspecies X and Y. Eventually, this geographic separation leads to genetic isolation, and two distinct new species, B and C, form.
This essay will focus on: the early evolution of our eukaryote ancestor during Precambrian period, plastids origin along the algae family due to second endosymbiosis; discuss the evidence that supports the theory, including further examples of endosymbiosis.
May 16, · Evolution Essay Evolution is the theory that all living forms came from ancient ancestors. Through a series of mutations, genetic drift, migration, and natural selection today’s descendants show an amazing amount of similarities and diversity.
Essay on Evolution There are many mechanisms that lead to evolutionary change. One of the most important mechanism in evolution is natural selection which is the differential success in the reproduction of different phenotypes resulting from the interaction of organisms with their environment. Sample Essay - Week 4: Speciation and the Fossil Record This essay was developed for the AMNH online course Evolution. Evolution is a part of Seminars on Science, a program of online graduate-level professional development courses for K educators.
An essay on evolution can be quite an interesting topic to work on. It is a topic that is being debated upon a lot in many academic circles. Evolution essays are details of different theories proposed by academicians who are advocates of different schools of thoughts. Creationism vs. evolution essay is popular for evolution research papers. Essays in Natural History and Evolution: THE ESSAY in science is an art form as well as a means of communicating ideas. All scientists publish their findings somewhere, but relatively few produce books or monographs. Even fewer produce essays.